The Home Office unlawfully locked a woman up in a “freezing” punishment room for 28 hours at a detention centre when she had committed no crime, a court has ruled.
The Kenyan asylum seeker, who is claiming asylum on the basis of her sexuality, was held in a room that had no bedding. It had just a “rusty toilet” at the Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre in September last year.
Segregation is permitted in immigration detention under certain circumstances. However, after 24 hours of locking someone in a cell on their own, the Home Secretary has to authorise any further period. Notably, in the case of this woman no such authorisation was sought. This occurred despite the fact she was held for a total of 28 hours.
The court case marks the first time segregation in detention has been challenged. Between 1,200 and 4,800 detainees are placed in segregation each year, according to research by charity Medical Justice. Many of them have committed no crime.
The woman said she was held in segregation because she had previously refused to “go quietly” with Home Office escorts. This occurred when they had tried to forcibly remove her from the UK, due to the fact that her asylum claim was still ongoing.
“I refused to go with the escorts because my immigration case was still going through the courts. No final decision had been made,” she told the Guardian.
“The staff said I was not compliant. There was no bedding and just a rusty toilet in the cell they put me in. I was freezing cold.”
When asked about the court case, she said: “I was anxious too but I had my lawyers behind me so I began the case against the Home Office while I was still locked up.
“I wasn’t just doing it for myself but for thousands of other immigration detainees. They are also placed in segregation, often without good reason.”
The woman’s solicitor, Lewis Kett of Duncan Lewis Solicitors, told The Independent the ruling was a “breakthrough” in one sense. It was the first time segregation in detention had been challenged.
“This is the first time that segregation in immigration detention has been found to be unlawful. There has been case law on segregation in the prison and hospital contexts. However, this is the first time it’s occurred in an immigration context. It’s a breakthrough in that sense,” he said.
Medical Justice, which observes the treatment of people in detention centres, describes the use of segregation on detainees as “one of the most severe and dangerous sanctions”. They say it can have a “devastating” impact on mental and physical health.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Detention is an important part of our immigration system, helping to ensure that those with no right to remain in the UK are returned to their home country if they will not leave voluntarily.
“We will now consider our next steps following today’s ruling.”
Source link-independent.co.uk
