Deputy President William Rutu says that it is sad and unfortunate that the Westgate attack was timed to coincide with his absence and the visit of President Kenyatta to New York for UN Assembly.He appreciates that the President had cancelled his visit.
Can Kenya’s president use Westgate tragedy to avoid ICC trial?
Kenyaโs President Uhuru Kenyatta has been a steadying force in the midst of Kenyaโs worst terror attack in more than a decade. He spoke with President Obama over the phone and yesterday declared the siege of Westgate Mall by Somali militants to be over.
This week also, as the world was transfixed on the chaos in Nairobi, President Kenyatta used the Al Shabab attack moment as a rationale for asking to skip parts of his upcoming trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC), set to open at The Hague on Nov. 12.
Both Mr. Kenyatta and Kenyaโs Vice President William Ruto were elected in March despite the ICC indictments for crimes against humanity โ charges that both men helped organize political violence in the aftermath of the 2007 national elections that left more than 1,000 persons dead and hundreds of thousands homeless.
Both say they will attend the trials and Mr. Ruto has already flown to The Hague to plead not guilty. But in recent weeks both men have been seeking new ways to avoid the trials or delay them. The court said no to local trials in East Africa, has denied Kenyatta’s request to have the trial take place by video, and today said no to a Kenyatta petition to have the trial delayed until this coming January.
However in the midst of the Westgate Mall crisis the ICC did on Sunday agree to let Ruto fly back to Kenya for a week to deal with official responsibilities.
After releasing Ruto, Mr. Kenyatta and his lawyers said that if the ICC can release Ruto then the president should be offered a similar accommodation.
Kenyatta’s lawyers say the ICC is denying Kenyans an effective government when it insists that the president should be present for his trial.
โPresident Kenyatta is satisfied that he will be able to adequately manage his defense by delegating responsibility to his legal team who are in receipt of full instructions,โ says Steven Kay, Kenyatta’s legal counsel.
Kenyattaโs request comes as the international community is closely watching what has become a test case for the ICC and for international justice writ large.
The two leaders are the highest sitting politicians ever to agree to face trial at the world court, and many in the human rights community see the ICC as an important if imperfect step of progress โ even as many Africans say their leaders and officials are being unjustly targeted or singled out.
Yet since Kenyatta has steadily promised he will attend his trial there is no reason he should now try to exempt himself, says Morris Odhiambo, executive director of Nairobi’s Centre for Law and Research International.
โ[Kenyatta] has assured the ICC that the case will not affect the country and we take him by his word,โ says Mr. Odhiambo. โThe main issue was whether the two of them [Kenyatta and Ruto] will be away at the same time,and I think that was settled,โ he added, speaking of an ICC decision not to hold both trials simultaneously.
For many Kenyans, the Westgate Mall attacks reinforce their view that Kenyatta cannot afford to be away.
โThese attacks are an indication that the president has to be here. His presence is needed to assure the citizens,โ said the Rev. Wellington Mutiso, a senior Baptist leader.
โThe whole process should be handled carefully in the best interest of the country and the international community. The president is a father figure and itโs of critical importance that he spends more time in the country,โ said Ndola Indidis, a former spokesman of the Kenyan Judiciary.
Source: https://www.csmonitor.com/