spot_img
Sunday, December 22, 2024
spot_img
spot_img

Fatou Bensouda to appeal against decision to excuse William Ruto from ICC trial

Theย International Criminal Courtย prosecution has applied for leave to appeal against a decision by Trial Chamber V to excuse Deputy Presidentย William Rutoย from continuous presence during hisย trial.

In the application, Chief Prosecutorย Fatou Bensoudaย wants Ruto to be present throughout theย trial.

- Advertisement -

Bensouda based her application on two fundamental issues; whether the Trial Chamber had discretionary power to excuse an accused from attending most of thetrialย and whether the test for an excusal of the accused developed by the Majority is supported by ICC law.

She argues that the two issues raised affect the fair conduct of the proceedings and the expeditious conduct of the proceedings because they raise the question whether an individual accused of very serious crimes holding certain official functions may be excused from continuous presence at theย trial, while others are not

- Advertisement -

โ€œIn this case, the Majority ruled that Mr Ruto was excused from his continuous presence at theย trialbecause he holds the โ€œoffice of the executive vice president of a Stateโ€. This does not apply to Mr Rutoโ€™s co-accused, Mr Sang, who accordingly would not be entitled to the same treatment under the law,โ€ Bensouda said in her argument.

She added that if theย trialย is conducted largely in the absence of Ruto, then the two issues are likely to be raised as part of an appeal against a decision of acquittal or conviction pursuant to Article 81.

This, she said, would lead to nullification of the entiretrialย proceedings which would have to be repeated if the Appeals Chamber finds that the accused ought to have been present during the bulk of theย trial.

โ€œThis will significantly delay the overall determination of responsibility of Ruto,โ€ Bensouda said.

Trial Chamber V had excused Ruto fromย trialย except the opening and closing statements of all parties and participants and when victims present their views and concerns in person during theย trial.

He is also required to be present during the delivery of judgment in the case and, if applicable, sentencing and reparations and any other attendance that may be ordered by the Chamber.-standardmedia.co.ke

Comment on the article

- Advertisement -spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Articles